Drawing for AXCMS.NET

USPTO serial 79029802

AXCMS.NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3409318Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 8, 2008
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AXCMS.NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KATHLEEN A. COSTIGAN

KATHLEEN A. COSTIGAN HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.ONE ROCKEFELLER PLAZA, 11TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009[ Computer programs recorded on data media designed for enterprise content management; ] downloadable software for enterprise content management [ ; computers ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042Recovery of computer data; consultancy in the field of computer hardware; computer programming; duplication of computer programs; rental of computers; computer software design; installation of computer systems; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; design of on-line computer software systems; computer systems analysis; [ conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; ] creating and maintaining web sites for others; data conversion of computer programs data; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; installation of computer software; maintenance of computer software [ ; rental of computer software ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 24, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 8, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Oct 9, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 9, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 6, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 8, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 22, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 2, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 18, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 13, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 23, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 19, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Oct 18, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 16, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 18, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 16, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance