Drawing for CIPUNET

USPTO serial 79029826

CIPUNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3453921Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 24, 2008
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with CIPUNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen Cooney-Porter

Kathleen Cooney-Porter Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato RoadSuite 310Fairfax, VA 22033

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Modems; modems used in connection with the transfer of voice and data over electrical power lines; power supplies for modems; voltage regulators; [ apparatus and devices for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; ] computer hardware and software for enabling voice and data communication over electrical power lines; computer hardware and software for enabling broadband capacity voice and data communication over electrical power lines; sensing and signaling devices for the measurement and control of electricity, namely, electric meters; apparatus and devices for power line communication systems, namely, low and medium voltage inductive and capacitive electric connectors for use with electrical power lines; automated meter reading systems, namely, automatic electronic systems for reading and controlling electric, gas and water utility meters; automatic electronic systems for remote monitoring and control of electric, gas and water utility meters, namely, spectrum analyzers and oscilloscopes, impedance measurement tools, frequency analyzers, AD converters, narrowband generators and broadband generators; power line communication test and analysis systems comprised of computer hardware, software, electronic sensors and digital displays for monitoring and analyzing the transmission of voice and data over electrical power lines; software for the control of power line communication systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 5, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 14, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 14, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 10, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 10, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 9, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 14, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 21, 2015LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Jan 21, 2015COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 21, 2015PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Oct 30, 2014LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 8, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 8, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 24, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2013CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 4, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 24, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 27, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 18, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 17, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 23, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 23, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 3, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance