USPTO serial 79029840
R LANEROSSI R FILATI 1817
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3501929Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2008
- Examiner
- ORNDORFF, LINDA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with R LANEROSSI R FILATI 1817?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MANIFATTURA LANE GAETANO MARZOTTO & FIGL
I-36078 Valdagno, IT
Other trademarks owned by MANIFATTURA LANE GAETANO MARZOTTO & FIGL
I-20121 MILANO, IT
I-20121 MILANO, IT
MILANO, IT
Vicenza, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. Groos
Richard J. Groos King & Spalding LLP500 West 2nd Street, 1800Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 023 | Yarns and threads for textile use | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MANIFATTURA LANE GAETANO MARZOTTO & FIGL
- Other trademarks owned by FILIVIVI S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by FILIVIVI S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by FILIVIVI S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by MARZOTTO LAB S.R.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 023
- Similar marks named R LANEROSSI R FILATI 1817
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 29, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2018 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |