Drawing for Serial No. 79029848

USPTO serial 79029848

Serial No. 79029848

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79029848?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terryence F. Chapman, David G. Boutell, Mark L. Maki, Liane L. Churney, Brian R. Tumm, Steven R. Thiel, Donald J. Wallace, Dale H. Thiel and Sidney B. Williams, Jr.

Terryence F. Chapman, David G. Boutell, Mark L. Ma Flynn, Thiel, Boutell & Tanis, P.C.2026 Rambling RoadKalamazoo, MI 49008-1631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunication devices for telephones, namely, earphones, earphone microphones, audio-input ear-microphones, headphones, loudspeakers, microphones, sound collecting microphones; transmitting/receiving devices, namely, receivers and transmitters for use with radios, transceivers, landline telephones, mobile telephones and IP phones; portable radio communication machines and apparatus, namely, portable audio players; portable radios; portable telephones with televisions; automobile navigation systems; mobile telephonesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2009DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 25, 2008PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
May 1, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 24, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 10, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2008PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2008MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jan 16, 2008ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Dec 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 29, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 29, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 21, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance