USPTO serial 79029874
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Bath linen, brocades, calico, cotton fabrics, sleeping bag sheets,covers for cushions, bed blankets, travel blankets; cloth linings for clothing, bed sheets, eiderdowns, hand towels of textile; loose fabric covers for furniture, for pillows and for cushions; jersey fabric; bed and household linen; tablecloths not of paper, curtains of textile, face towels and washing and bath gloves, table napkins of textile, tablemats of textile; namely, linen and jute fabrics; oilcloths tablecloths, knitted fabric, velvet, glazing curtains | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely, bathing suits and trunks, beach clothes, belts, bodices, braces, brassieres, chemisettes, coats, collars, combinations, corselets, corsets, dress shields, dressing gowns, furs, gabardines, gloves, jackets, knitwear, namely, coats, pulovers; jumpers, body linen, namely, underwear; ties, outer clothing, namely, coats; overcoats, overalls, pyjamas, pants, parkas, petticoats, pullovers, ready-made clothing, scarves, shirts, socks, stockings, suits, sweaters, swimming suits, tee shirts, trousers, underclothing, underpants, underwear, uniforms, vests,footwear, headgear, namely, caps, hats | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |