USPTO serial 79029880
CRYSTALMAKER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3280224Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 14, 2007
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CRYSTALMAKER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yarnton, Oxfordshire, GB
Yarnton, Oxfordshire, GB
Yarnton, Oxfordshire, GB
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for visualization of crystal and molecular structures in the fields of science and engineering | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software, computer consultancy services and technical support, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CrystalMaker Software Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by CrystalMaker Software Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by CrystalMaker Software Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CRYSTALMAKER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 2, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |