Drawing for Serial No. 79029884

USPTO serial 79029884

Serial No. 79029884

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3373243Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 22, 2008
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79029884?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leigh Ann Lindquist

Leigh Ann Lindquist Sughrue Mion, PLLC2100 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Suite 800Washington, DC 20037-3213

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Crash helmets and protective helmets for bicyclists, motorcyclists and skiers; protective gloves for industrial use; protective work gloves; protective masks; sports, motorcycle, cycling and ski goggles; accessories for spectacles, namely spectacle cases, spectacle frames; neck cords for spectaclesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
014Horological and chronometric instruments, namely wristwatches; watchstraps; tiepins; cigar cases of precious metal and their alloys; jewelry, jewelry chains, amulets, ornamental pins, ringsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
016StickersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
026Belt buckles not of precious metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 25, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 29, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 29, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 13, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 29, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 17, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 29, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 22, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 22, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance