USPTO serial 79029916
BELLISSIMA BY FAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BELLISSIMA BY FAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing for men, women and children in general, namely, dresses made from skins, shirts, ladies' shirts, skirts, ladies' suits, jackets, trousers, shorts, vests, knitwear, namely, knit shirts, pajamas, socks, tights, knitted underwear, corsages in the nature of bodices to be incorporated into clothing, suspender belts, briefs and pants, brassieres, combinations, bathing suits, sports overalls, belts, sashes for wear, and dressing gowns | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2025 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| Feb 14, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |