Drawing for JIDE

USPTO serial 79029977

JIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Washing machines; swaging machines; dry-cleaning machines; wringing machines for laundry; dishwashers; electric blenders, for household purposes; electric food processors; electric fruit presses, for household purposes; household bean juice makers; electric kitchen machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
011Refrigerators; ice chests; air conditioning installations; electric fans for personal use; water heaters; gas burners; extractor hoods for kitchens; lamps; drinking water machine; sterilized cupboardSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 8, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 8, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 8, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 8, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 2, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 1, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance