Drawing for SOTRAFA ALVATECH 5002

USPTO serial 79030068

SOTRAFA ALVATECH 5002

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3405659Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 1, 2008
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with SOTRAFA ALVATECH 5002?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neal E. Friedman

Neal E. Friedman Davis & Bujold, P.L.L.C.112 Pleasant StreetConcord, NH 03301UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019plastic sheets for use in the construction business intended to contain specific materials and avoid their loss due to filtration; plastic sheets for reinforcing geotechnical structuresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 12, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 2, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 26, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 13, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 20, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 10, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Sep 10, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 17, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 17, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 26, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 10, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 7, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance