USPTO serial 79030074
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey D. Sanok
Jeffrey D. Sanok Crowell & Moring LLPP.O. BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business development, namely, providing start-up support for businesses of others and business management consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Adult educational services, namely, conducting classes, workshops and seminars in the field of managing and developing companies | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | 71AF | REGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 22, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 4, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |