Drawing for NEULAND & PARTNER

USPTO serial 79030074

NEULAND & PARTNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3398670Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 18, 2008
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NEULAND & PARTNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey D. Sanok

Jeffrey D. Sanok Crowell & Moring LLPP.O. BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business development, namely, providing start-up support for businesses of others and business management consultation servicesACTIVE—
041Adult educational services, namely, conducting classes, workshops and seminars in the field of managing and developing companiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 15, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 9, 2014NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - MAILED—
Apr 9, 201471AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 8, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 6, 201471AFREGISTERED-SEC.71 FILED—
Mar 6, 2014ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2010FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 20, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 20, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 18, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 18, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 10, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Sep 6, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 4, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance