USPTO serial 79030108
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell
Mary Margaret L. O'Donnell Rader, Fishman & Grauer PLLC39533 Woodward Avenue, Suite 140Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | General purpose adhesive for use within the roofing industry for adhering roofing components within built up roofing systems; chemicals used in industry and construction, namely, roofing adhesive and industrial adhesives for use in coating and sealing walls, roofs and surfaces; unprocessed artificial and synthetic resins, polyester resins and plastics for use in the building, repair and construction industries; adhesives for use in construction and industry; waterproofing chemical compositions | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | Paints; coatings in the nature of paints; anti-corrosive and anti-staining paint and coatings for use in the building and construction industries; waterproofing preparations and substances, namely, paint; waterproofing compounds, with or without reinforcement materials, namely, water based paint applied to protect surfaces against the deleterious effects of the weather; preservatives against rust in the nature of a coating; varnishes, japans, lacquers, anti-corrosive paints, anti-fouling compositions in the nature of paint, wood preservatives, water based coatings all having fire-retardant properties for use on building construction materials; enamel paints; paint sealers; sealants, namely, corrosion inhibiting paints; thinners for all of the aforesaid goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Insulation roofing, wall cladding and building constructions; packing materials of rubber and plastic for use on industrial packing; rubber stoppers for industrial packaging containers; adhesive, synthetic, plastic, elastomeric, resin-based or rubber sealing compounds for use on pipe, wall, pavement or roof joints; plastic sealing compounds for use on roofs and pipes; waterproofing membranes for foundations of buildings; preparations namely sealants and insulating compounds consisting of resins, rubber, tape, acetate and gum for repairing walls, roofs, ceilings and flooring; rubber, raw or semi-worked; insulating felt for use in the construction industry; fiberglass insulation for building; insulating materials, namely, felt, gutta-percha, gum, and mica; fabric in the form of strapping and adhesive tape and roofing fabric for strengthening or reinforcing materials used in repairing cracks, joints and the like in buildings or building surfaces | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Roofing materials of asphalt and bitumen; non-metallic roofs; asphalt; pitch, and bitumen asphalt, bitumen-based sealant for roofing; bricks; cement mix, processed cement for use in the repair of roofs, walls, roads, car parks; building materials for use on decking and flooring, namely, boards; roofing cement; wall tiles; non-metallic materials for surfacing, decks and floors; stone roofing tiles; terracotta floor tiles; non-metal skylights; non-metal roof trims; membranes for waterproofing floors, in the nature of concrete sealers; building materials, namely, cement, lime, and mortar | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 027 | Floor coverings | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 2, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 16, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |