USPTO serial 79030118
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
POD IP Pty Ltd; ACN 069 583 428
JAN JUC VIC 3228, AU
POD IP Pty Ltd; ACN 069 583 428
JAN JUC VIC 3228, AU
AU
POD IP Pty Ltd; ACN 069 583 428
JAN JUC VIC 3228, AU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kathryn Starshak
Kathryn Starshak K&L Gates LLPP.O. Box 1135Chicago, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | MEDICAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BRACES FOR JOINT FIXATION OF KNEE, [ELBOW, ANKLE, WRIST, SHOULDER, NECK, FINGER AND BACK; BRACES,] PADS AND GUARDS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES, NAMELY, FOR USE AS JOINT. MUSCLE AND LIGAMENT PROTECTORS; ORTHOPEDIC PROTECTIVE SUPPORTS FOR KNEE,[ ELBOW, WRIST, NECK, BACK, SHOULDER, FINGER AND ANKLE;] MEDICAL PRODUCTS FOR THE PREVENTION OF INJURIES TO BONES, JOINTS, MUSCLES, TENDONS, AND LIGAMENTS, NAMELY, CONTINUOUS PASSIVE MOTION BRACES FOR JOINTS[, NAMELY, KNEE, ELBOW, WRIST, NECK, SHOULDER, FINGER AND ANKLES] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2025 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 29, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2019 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 19, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 14, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2009 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |