USPTO serial 79030150
MEDIOLIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3362671Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2008
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIOLIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AU
AU
AU
AU
AU
AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Dietary food supplements, which use solely, or as an ingredient, olive leaf extracts and by-products and compounds found within olive leaves, olive fruit and olive oil; dietary supplemental drinks, which use solely, or as an ingredient, olive leaf extracts and by-products and compounds found within olive leaves, olive fruit and olive oil; medicated skin care preparations which use solely, or as an ingredient, olive leaf extracts and by-products and compounds found within olive leaves, olive fruit and olive oil | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Raymond Percy Archer
- Other trademarks owned by Raymond Percy Archer
- Other trademarks owned by Raymond Percy Archer
- Other trademarks owned by Julian Wayne Archer
- Other trademarks owned by Julian Wayne Archer
- Other trademarks owned by Julian Wayne Archer
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named MEDIOLIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 8, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |