USPTO serial 79030226
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
DE
Ing. Haaga Werkzeugbau GmbH & Co. KG
73230 Kirchheim, DE
Other trademarks owned by Ing. Haaga Werkzeugbau GmbH & Co. KG
Ing. Haaga Werkzeugbau GmbH & Co. KG
73230 Kirchheim, DE
Other trademarks owned by Ing. Haaga Werkzeugbau GmbH & Co. KG
Reichenbach ander Fils, DD
Ing. Haaga Werkzeugbau GmbH & Co. KG
73230 Kirchheim, DE
Other trademarks owned by Ing. Haaga Werkzeugbau GmbH & Co. KG
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Hand guided road sweepers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 7, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 15, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 17, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |