Drawing for MIKOTRIK

USPTO serial 79030296

MIKOTRIK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIKOTRIK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for agriculture, horticulture, forestry and floriculture; fertilizers; manures; composts; mulch; plant nourishment; plant growth control products; flower preservation products; plant defence productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Phytosanitary products; preparations for destroying vermin; slug and snail killers; fungicides; pesticides; herbicides; insecticides; insectifuges; weed killers; plant destroying products; repellent products for animals; anticryptogamic products; parasiticidal productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2018DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 28, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 15, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 3, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 11, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 6, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 4, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 3, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance