Drawing for MEDIA CATALYST

USPTO serial 79030319

MEDIA CATALYST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4144626Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 22, 2012
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEDIA CATALYST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Leslie P. Kramer

Leslie P. Kramer Faegre Baker Daniels LLP1700 Lincoln Street3200 Wells Fargo CenterDenver, CO 80203-4532

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely, video, audio and electronic data recorders for use in the fields of marketing, branding, advertising and web hosting; blank recording discs for computers; computer memories and computer software programs for use in film and music editing and for use in relation to digital animation and special effects design, all for use in the field of marketing, branding, advertising and web hosting; blank optical data carriers; data processing apparatus, namely, computers for use in the field of marketing, branding, advertising and web hostingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
035Business administration; providing office functions; management of databases; systemization of information into computer databases; compilation of information into computer databases; business research; business appraisals; advertising; on-line advertising on a computer network; digital marketing and business communication; professional business consultancySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
042Scientific research and technical consultation and design for others in the fields of marketing, branding, advertising and web hosting, namely, industrial design analysis and industrial research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; updating of computer software for others; computer programming; installation of computer software; design and maintenance of websites for others; computer system design; maintenance of computer software; computer system analysis; rental of computer software; hosting computer sites websites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; design, development and maintenance of websites; professional consultancy in the field of computer software, websites and hosting websites; technical advice in the field of computer software, websites and hosting websitesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 15, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 22, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 6, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 15, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 5, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 20, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 24, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 17, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 17, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 23, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 15, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 23, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 23, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 27, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 29, 2009NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 8, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 27, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 27, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 24, 2007CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 23, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2007DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 29, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance