CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MOSCOW NIGHTS

USPTO serial 79030321

MOSCOW NIGHTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3485076Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 12, 2008
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOSCOW NIGHTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward J. Chalfie

Edward J. Chalfie Welsh & Katz, Ltd.120 S. Riverside PlazaSuite 2200Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Distilled spiritsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 4, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 26, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jan 27, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jan 27, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 13, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 13, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 12, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 27, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 9, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 9, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 13, 2007NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2007CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 30, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 29, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 30, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 30, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance