Drawing for GOLD & WOOD PARIS

USPTO serial 79030348

GOLD & WOOD PARIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3376191Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 29, 2008
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOLD & WOOD PARIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN

LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacles, spectacle frames, spectacle cases, sunglassesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
014[ Jewelry; precious stones; timepieces and chronometric instruments; precious metals and their alloys ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2018DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 28, 2018DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 31, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Aug 6, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2015INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 7, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2014INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 30, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Jan 30, 2014C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 30, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 10, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 10, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 23, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 29, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 29, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 7, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 7, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 31, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 23, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 2, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 2, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance