Drawing for LODICEL

USPTO serial 79030411

LODICEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3348811Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 4, 2007
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LODICEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP1020 Marsh RoadSuite 200MENLO PARK, CA 94025

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Cellulose ethers for industrial use and for use in the manufacture of food additives; chemicals for use in the manufacture of cosmetics; industrial chemicals other than for medical or veterinary use; unprocessed plastics; paper and wood pulp for manufacturing purposes, binding agents for use in tablets and granules for medicines and drugsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
005Film coating agents for pharmaceutical products, enteric coating agents for pharmaceutical compositions, disintegrants for use as components in pharmaceutical products and controlled release agents for oral administration of medicines; pharmaceutical excipients for medicines, capsules sold empty for pharmaceutical useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 25, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Nov 24, 2021INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2021INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 6, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2021INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 26, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 2, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2016REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 12, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Nov 29, 2013NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2013C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 29, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 14, 2013715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 14, 2013ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 4, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance