USPTO serial 79030418
WRIGLEY'S EXTRA PROFESSIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3307574Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 9, 2007
- Examiner
- OTT, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WRIGLEY'S EXTRA PROFESSIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Confectionery, namely chewing gum, bubble gum, candy and mints | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WM. WRIGLEY JR. COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by WM. WRIGLEY JR. COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named WRIGLEY'S EXTRA PROFESSIONAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2017 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 28, 2014 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 3, 2014 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |