USPTO serial 79030460
INNHANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INNHANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry, science and photography, as well as in agriculture, horticulture and forestry; synthetic sweeteners and prebiotic products, fructo-oligosaccharides, galacto-oligosaccharides, tagatose, trehalulose, chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs; manures; unprocessed artificial resins, unprocessed plastics; fire extinguishing compositions; tanning substances; adhesives used in industry; tempering and soldering preparations | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Sugar, products of saccharinated starch, glucose for food, rice, tapioca, sago, flour and preparations made from cereals; bread, pastry and confectionery, ices; honey, treacle, yeast, baking-powder, salt, mustard, vinegar, sauces (condiments), spices, ice; sweets, candy, flavourings (except ethereal oils), flavour enhancers, essences for foodstuffs (except etheric essences and essential oils); natural sweeteners, dietetic foodstuffs or food supplements not for medical purposes based on carbohydrates, included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 3, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 26, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Nov 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |