USPTO serial 79030485
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
74354 Besigheim, DE
74354 Besigheim, DE
74354 Besigheim, DE
DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus Luepke
Marcus Luepke Muncy Geissler Olds Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine-driven tools, namely, tools for machine tools, namely, cutting machine tools with fixed or exchangeable cutters made of hard cutting materials, namely, drilling tools, boring, reboring and boring-out tools, [ super-finish lathe tools, ] countersinking and deburring tools, lancing tools; cutting machine tools with exchangeable boring-out rods and boring-out steels, namely, chisels for inside and outside work and lancing; support, guide, adjusting and clamping elements for use with machine tools; manually adjustable and machine-adjustable machine-driven tools; machine-driven special tools and their components, namely, [ machine-driven saws, saw blades and saw inserts made of hard cutting materials for the aforementioned saws, ] power-operated metal cutters, power-operated drills, power-operated pilot, center and lead drill bits for drills, reborers and out-borers, [ super-finish lathe tools, reamers, countersinkers and deburrers, ] lances, threaders; tool-holding fixtures or adapters, namely, taper shanks, clamping chucks, extension and reducing pieces for machine tools; machine-driven modular add-on tools with couplings as interface and separation points for a manual or machine-operated coupling of tools to machine tool spindles and tools; cutting inserts, reversible cutting plates [ and lathe chisels ] made of hard cutting materials for use in machine tools; tool holders with firmly fixed or exchangeable cutters for use in machine tools, namely, reversible cutting plate inserts, lathe chisels, clamping and mounting inserts and holders, super-finish lathe inserts and parts thereof, namely, bolts, clamps and screws | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 26, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2010 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |