Drawing for TWINKOM

USPTO serial 79030486

TWINKOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3395071Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 11, 2008
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TWINKOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marcus Luepke

Marcus Luepke Muncy Geissler Olds Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato Road, Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine-driven tools, namely, tools for machine tools, namely, cutting machine tools with fixed or exchangeable cutters made of hard cutting materials, namely, drilling tools, boring, reboring and boring-out tools, [ super-finish lathe tools, countersinking and deburring tools, lancing tools; ] cutting machine tools with exchangeable boring-out rods and boring-out steels, namely, chisels for inside and outside work and lancing; support, guide, adjusting and clamping elements for use with machine tools; manually adjustable and machine-adjustable machine-driven tools; machine-driven special tools and their components, namely, machine-driven [ saws, saw blades and saw inserts made of hard cutting materials for the aforementioned saws, ] power-operated metal cutters, power-operated drills, power-operated pilot, center and lead drill bits for drills, reborers and out-borers, [ super-finish lathe tools, reamers, countersinkers and deburrers, lances, threaders; ] tool-holding fixtures or adapters, namely, taper shanks, clamping chucks, extension and reducing pieces for machine tools; machine-driven modular add-on tools with couplings as interface and separation points for a manual or machine-operated coupling of tools to machine tool spindles and tools; cutting inserts, reversible cutting plates and lathe chisels made of hard cutting materials for use in machine tools; tool holders with firmly fixed or exchangeable cutters for use in machine tools, namely, reversible cutting plate inserts, lathe chisels, clamping and mounting inserts and holders, [ super-finish lathe inserts and parts thereof, namely, ] bolts, clamps and screwsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 13, 2020INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Oct 11, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 18, 2019INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 18, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 24, 2019INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 24, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Aug 30, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Apr 11, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Apr 11, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 10, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Mar 10, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 20, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 8, 2010FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 11, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 20, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 16, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 13, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 13, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 23, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 21, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance