Drawing for EASY CARE FINISHING TECHNOLOGY BY BASF

USPTO serial 79030499

EASY CARE FINISHING TECHNOLOGY BY BASF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3431394Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 20, 2008
Examiner
ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EASY CARE FINISHING TECHNOLOGY BY BASF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELIZABETH PASQUINE

ELIZABETH PASQUINE NOVAK DRUCE + QUIGG LLP1300 I STREET, NW1000 WEST TOWERWASHINGTON, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Textile fabrics for home and commercial interiors; unfitted furniture covers not of paper; textile fabrics for the manufacture of clothing; textile tablecloths; bed and table linensSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, namely, tops, T-shirts, sweaters, shirts, blouses, bottoms and trousersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 19, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 2, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 14, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 26, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 26, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 20, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 8, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 4, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 13, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 29, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 29, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 11, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 11, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 9, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 9, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 9, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 8, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 2, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 9, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 9, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Feb 7, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 6, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Feb 3, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance