Drawing for LIGHTHOUSE

USPTO serial 79030509

LIGHTHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 401
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JUN, WON KYUNG WENDY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIGHTHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Probes for measurements in industrial processes or in laboratory process equipmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 24, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 22, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2008IROPIRREGULARITY ON NOTICE OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 16, 2007DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 26, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 24, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 23, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 22, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance