USPTO serial 79030594
TOUCH WINDOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOUCH WINDOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Sipiora, Esquire and Ryan D. Phillips, Esquire
DAVID E. SIPIORA, ESQUIRE TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CENTER, 8TH FLSAN FRANCISO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data input/output devices, namely, touch panels, touch screens, liquid crystal display panels, electronic pens and their parts and electronic machines incorporating the foregoing, namely, phones, personal digital assistants, computers and cameras; portable telephones; personal digital assistants; smartphones; laptop computers; computers; digital cameras | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2017 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 9, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |