Drawing for DEUROWOOD

USPTO serial 79030601

DEUROWOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3369603Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 15, 2008
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DEUROWOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN ALUMIT

JOHN ALUMIT PATEL & ALUMIT, P.C.,16830 VENTURA BLVD.,SUITE 360ENCINO, CA 91436

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in industry and science; Chemicals for use in industry, namely plasticizers and chemicals used in the manufacture of paper; Curing agent dispersion for the preparation of clear coats, enamels and primers; Wetting agents; Surface active compounds for general use in the industrial arts, namely, as wetting, spreading, emulsifying, dispersing and penetrating agents; Chemical preservatives for use in the production of a wide variety of chemicalsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
002Varnishes; Raw natural resins for use in the manufacture of resins and for general industrial use; Wood preservatives; Colorants, paints and dyes for general industrial useSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 22, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 14, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 25, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 22, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 22, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 8, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 30, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 22, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 1, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 24, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance