Drawing for HEARCOSMETICS

USPTO serial 79030643

HEARCOSMETICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3275554Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2007
Examiner
OTT, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HEARCOSMETICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anna W. Manville, Esq.

Anna W. Manville, Esq. ARNOLD & PORTER LLP555 Twelfth Street, NWIP DOCKETINGWashington, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Hearing aidsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 12, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Apr 24, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Nov 14, 2014INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 24, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2011CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Nov 25, 2011CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 3, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 24, 2008ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 17, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2007FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2007FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 6, 2007FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 19, 2007FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 2, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 16, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance