Drawing for WALLSIDE

USPTO serial 79030647

WALLSIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WALLSIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
019Wainscotting, not of metal; wood panelling; parquet flooring and wooden wainscotting or wood-based composites; parquet floor boards; furrings of wood; special mouldings or sections for building and decoration, not of metal; sawn timber; wood veneers; palings, non-metallic fences; wood, glulam for buildings; plant support structures, pergolas, non-metallic latticework; timber framing; ledger strips of woodSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 16, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Mar 25, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 24, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 12, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 20, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 24, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 20, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jan 19, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jan 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance