Drawing for DIMI

USPTO serial 79030686

DIMI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3348818Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 4, 2007
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIMI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward W. Goodman, Robert J. Kraus, David L. Barnes, Michael E. Marion, Jack E. Haken

Edward W. Goodman PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORPORATIONP.O. Box 3001Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus and instruments for recording, transmission, reproduction and processing of sound, images and data, namely computerized user interface systems comprising computers, video cameras, microphones and electric or electronic sensors for detecting human speech and motion and computer software for the processing of information from such sensing devices, for providing messaging services; communications software for connecting computer network users, for playing and displaying digital media and for providing home surveillanceSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 19, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 31, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 11, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 11, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Mar 11, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jul 11, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 12, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 8, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 18, 2008FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 26, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 26, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 4, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 4, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 18, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 14, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 14, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 28, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance