USPTO serial 79030687
ESTHEMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESTHEMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Nourishing creams, eyebrow pencils, lipsticks, mascara, nail polish, liquid foundations, blushers, sunscreen creams, skin lotions, skin fresheners, skin cleansing cream, eye shadow, eau de Cologne, lotions for face and body care, cold creams, solid powder for compacts, creamy foundations, skin whitening creams, perfumes, hair lotions, detergents prepared from petroleum for household cleaning use, liquid soaps, cleansers for detergent purposes, bath soaps, cosmetic soaps, shampoos, hair rinses, false eyelashes, false nails, tooth paste | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Cosmetics sales agencies, cosmetics sales arranging | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2016 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2008 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |