USPTO serial 79030729
PM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3356601Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 18, 2007
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with PM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PUTZMEISTER Aktiengesellschaft
Aichtal, DE
PUTZMEISTER Aktiengesellschaft
Aichtal, DE
PUTZMEISTER Aktiengesellschaft
Aichtal, DE
Putzmeister Concrete Pumps GmbH
DE
DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter A. Chiabotti
Peter A. Chiabotti Akerman LLPP.O. Box 3188West Palm Beach, FL 33402-3188UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Construction machines namely stationary and mobile pumps for solid materials; concrete pumps which can be mounted on chassis, vehicles and rail-mounted trucks; pneumatic conveyors for solid materials; concrete mixers; high-pressure injection pumps; concrete distribution booms; power-driven working platforms; giant robots mounted on chassis or vehicles; coating machines for the building industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PUTZMEISTER Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by PUTZMEISTER Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by PUTZMEISTER Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Putzmeister Concrete Pumps GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Putzmeister Engineering GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named PM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2016 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 6, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 16, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |