Drawing for RAIL SIMULATOR

USPTO serial 79030764

RAIL SIMULATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3423084Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 6, 2008
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAIL SIMULATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tawnya R Wojciechowski

TAWNYA R WOJCIECHOWSKI TRW LAW GROUP19900 MACARTHUR BLVDSTE 1150IRVINE, CA 92612-8433

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software; entertainment computer game programs; computer game disks; downloadable computer game software for use with television receivers and other external display devices; DVDs featuring video gamesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 24, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 2, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 12, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 12, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 22, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 22, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 22, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 6, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 6, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 1, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 27, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance