USPTO serial 79030800
BIOGREEN3000
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOGREEN3000?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical preparations to prevent mildew and chemical preparations for scientific purposes, none of the aforementioned goods for use in vehicles, drainage treatment nor in septic facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Antimicrobial coatings to treat the growth of mold, mildew, bacteria and fungi on various surfaces not including use with vehicles, drainage treatment nor water treatment of septic facilities; medical surfaces; bacteriological preparations for medical purposes with antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral and antimicrobial properties; disinfectants for sanitary purposes; chemical preparations for medical purposes with antibacterial, antifungal,antiviral and antimicrobial properties; germicides for medical purposes; sanitary preparations for medical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2009 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |