Drawing for UNIPASTER

USPTO serial 79030806

UNIPASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3302965Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 2, 2007
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIPASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lance J. Lieberman

LANCE J. LIEBERMAN Cozen O'Connor277 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10172UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Printing presses, in particular for web-fed offset printing for newspapers and illustrations, for sheet-fed offset printing, for digital printing, and replacement parts thereof; machines as parts of or accessories to printing presses for processing plastics, in particular for varnishing and print finishing; machines, namely automatic folders; printing material feeding machines and printing material delivery machines; packaging machines for printed material; machines for transporting paper during the printing process; machine-operated platforms for storing paper during the printing process; printing plate bending machines; machines for changing printing rollers in printing pressesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 26, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 10, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 10, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 9, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 9, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jul 25, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 14, 2009CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Sep 4, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 26, 2008FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 3, 2008CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 18, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 18, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jan 15, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 17, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 27, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 17, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 17, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 11, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 11, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 4, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 27, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 12, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance