USPTO serial 79030875
TONDO ACETO BALSAMICO DI MODENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3376200Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 29, 2008
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TONDO ACETO BALSAMICO DI MODENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IT
I-41126 MODENA (MO), IT
London NW11 7TJ, GB
London NW11 7TJ, GB
London NW11 7TJ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
John Alumit ALUMIT IP135 South Jackson StreetSuite 200GLENDALE, CA 91205Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | [ JELLIES, JAMS, COMPOTES; EDIBLE OILS AND FATS ] | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | CANDIES, HONEY, TREACLE, MUSTARD, VINEGAR, SAUCES, NAMELY, KETCHUP, SOY SAUCE, CHILI SAUCE, PEPPER SAUCE, FISH SAUCE, HOT SAUCE, SALAD SAUCE/DRESSING, TARTAR SAUCE, BARBECUE SAUCES, CHEESE SAUCE AND SPICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEROMODENA S.R.L.
- Other trademarks owned by NEROMODENA S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by NEROMODENA UK Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by NEROMODENA UK Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by NEROMODENA UK Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named TONDO ACETO BALSAMICO DI MODENA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2018 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2017 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 23, 2016 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2016 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 10, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2014 | 715F | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2014 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 17, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |