Drawing for MORPHO SLIM

USPTO serial 79030907

MORPHO SLIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MORPHO SLIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert F. Zielinski, Esq.

ROBERT F ZIELINSKI Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney PC1835 Market Street14th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetic products for slimming purposes, namely, creams, lotions, gels, and serum.SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jan 27, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 26, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 28, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2009FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 23, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 23, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2006RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 13, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 8, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 7, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2006LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Dec 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance