Drawing for YUSHIRO

USPTO serial 79030910

YUSHIRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3378850Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 5, 2008
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with YUSHIRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian B. Darville

Brian B. Darville Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P.1940 Duke StreetAlexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004Mineral oils and greases for industrial purposes; non-mineral oils and greases for industrial purposes; [industrial greases;] lubricating oils; cutting oils; [petroleum jelly for industrial purposes;] quenching oils; mould releasing oilsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 25, 2021CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jan 8, 2021CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 2, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 11, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 23, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 23, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 19, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 20, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2017REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 9, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2014NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED—
Feb 15, 2014C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 15, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 4, 2014715FREGISTERED - SEC. 71 & SEC. 15 FILED—
Feb 4, 2014ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 5, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 13, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 12, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 29, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 3, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 3, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 22, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Feb 3, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 2, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance