Drawing for ELLA

USPTO serial 79030956

ELLA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3369612Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 15, 2008
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELLA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christine B. Redfield

CHRISTINE B. REDFIELD KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON ET AL630 HANSEN WAYPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic updatable display panels in the form of signs, labels, tags, and cards; control systems for electronic updatable displays, signage, labels, tags and cards consisting of control electronics in the nature of embedded integrated circuits, electronic labels, application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), and software for connecting to other systems, driving the contents of the above mentioned devices, and controlling data communication; a data communication system comprising Ethernet connections, WLAN radio or customer specific radio, and proprietary radio * none of the aforesaid goods related to the office supplies sector *SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 6, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 15, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 25, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 22, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 22, 2014C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 11, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2010COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Jan 14, 2010PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Jan 1, 2010LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 31, 2009LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2009CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 8, 2009FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 25, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 16, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 15, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 15, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance