Drawing for MHW

USPTO serial 79031047

MHW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MHW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Lifting apparatus; hydraulic motors and engines; hydraulic controls for machines, motors and engines; parts for the aforesaid goods, in particular valves, cylinders, pumps and control devicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
012Parts for land, air or water vehicles, in particular tailboard lifts, lifting devices (in the opinion of the International Bureau, the terms are too vague for the purpose of classification - see Rule 13(2)(b) of the Common Regulations), superstructures for motor vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 25, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 15, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 21, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 19, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance