Drawing for SUPERCOINING

USPTO serial 79031055

SUPERCOINING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3508786Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 30, 2008
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUPERCOINING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN J QUIGLEY

STEPHEN J QUIGLEY OSTROLENK FABER GERB SOFFEN LLP1180 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Unwrought and semi-wrought common metals, namely, irons and steels, and their alloys, namely, aluminum alloys, lead alloys; anchors, anvils, metal bells, laminated and cast construction materials, namely, cast iron; metal tracks and materials for railway tracks; metal chains, except drive chains for motor cars; non-electrical metal cables and wires; locksmithing, namely, metal locks; metal tubes and pipes, metal safes, steel balls, nails and metal screws; metal ores, namely, copper ores, lead ores; metal goods not included in other classes, namely, beams of metal, awnings of metal; prefabricated metal parts included in this class, namely, door panels of metal, metal building flashingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 12, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 4, 2016INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 5, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jan 1, 2016INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 1, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Apr 20, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 16, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 16, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Dec 30, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 15, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 10, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 20, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 20, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 15, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 7, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 22, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 7, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 27, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2006RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2006RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 16, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 15, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance