Drawing for TALENT

USPTO serial 79031063

TALENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TALENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical products for use in industry, agriculture and horticulture (except fungicides, herbicides and pesticides)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Fungicides and herbicidesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2014DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 10, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 17, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2011CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 29, 2010CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 7, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 1, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Nov 30, 2006SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance