USPTO serial 79031075
ESSERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAAFAR, SAMIR MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ESSERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEITH A WELTSCH
KEITH A WELTSCH SCULLY SCOTT MURPHY & PRESSER400 GARDEN CITY PLAZASUITE 300GARDEN CITY, NY 11530Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Unworked or semi-worked leather, imitation of leather namely, moleskin, handbags, luggage, shoulder bags, beach bags, clutch bags, all purpose sports bags, attache cases, school bags, tote bags, travelling bags, cosmetic cases sold empty, keycases, knapsacks, rucksacks, briefcases, purses, wallets, travelling trunks, suitcases, umbrellas, parasols, walking sticks, dog collars, whips | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Brassieres, corsets, singlets, petticoats, nightgowns, pyjamas, dressing gowns, pullovers, bath robes, bathing suits, bathing caps, clothing namely, gloves and muffs, cardigans, jerseys, neckties, neckerchiefs, scarves, sweaters, socks, stockings, tights, trousers, leggings, skirts, jackets, jerkins, shirts, vests, waistcoats, jumpers, track suits, blouses, jeans, panties, underpants, bermuda shorts, T-shirts, sweat-shirts, suits and dresses, overcoats, anoraks, coats, raincoats, babies' pants, dance clothes, belts and sashes, suspenders, pareus, shoes, boots, slippers, hats, caps | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2007 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |