USPTO serial 79031083
OXYPURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3505426Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 23, 2008
- Examiner
- HELLMAN, ELI J
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OXYPURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL-2321 JX Leiden, NL
NL-2321 JX Leiden, NL
NL-2321 JX Leiden, NL
NL
NL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Optical, electronic and electric cables; cords, switching boxes and power supplies; electrical plugs; electrical sockets; in-earphones; headphones; microphones; loudspeakers; sound improvement equipment, namely, amplifiers and sound mixers; electrical power extension cords; parts for audio equipment, visual equipment, audio visual equipment, digital equipment, television, satellite, aerial, camcorder, computer, multimedia, telephone, mobile telephone, remote control and RF cordless equipment, namely, audio speakers, PCI cards, network switches, cordless routers, USB hubs, memory cards and aerials; accessories for audio equipment, visual equipment, audio visual equipment, digital equipment, television, satellite, aerial, camcorder, computer, multimedia, telephone, mobile telephone, remote control, and RF cordless equipment, namely, computer peripherals, and remote controls for audio, visual, audio visual and computer equipment | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bandridge Europe N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Bandridge Europe N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Bandridge Europe N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Datwyler TeCo Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Nedis Beheer B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named OXYPURE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 27, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 24, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 21, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 22, 2013 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | RHRD | RESTRICTION OF HOLDER'S RIGHT OF DISPOSAL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 13, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |