USPTO serial 79031125
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | X-ray inspection devices, namely, scanners for hand and check-in luggage, for large objects, for bulky luggage and packages; scanners; mail and parcel scanning system comprised of scanners, radiation detection devices, and image processing devices; mobile [ X-ray inspection systems comprised of scanners, radiation detection devices, and image processing devices; ] X-ray inspection systems comprising scanners, radiation detection devices, and image processing devices [ for vehicles ]; cargo inspection systems comprising scanners, radiation detection devices, and image processing devices; container inspection systems comprising scanners, electrical and electronic devices, instruments, equipment and installations, namely, X-ray inspection systems for the inspection of objects and persons, particularly in an access, safety or airport area; electrical and electronic devices, instruments, equipment and installations, namely, scanners for non-destructive material examination, [ radioactivity detection, ] explosives detection, drug and narcotic detection, metal detection, weapons detection [ ; electrical, electronic and optical alarm and surveillance devices, namely, scanners, radiation detection devices, and image processing devices, as well as electric and electronic video surveillance installations ] | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | [ Security inspections for others of objects and persons ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2026 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2018 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2016 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 27, 2016 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 27, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |