Drawing for HI-SCAN

USPTO serial 79031125

HI-SCAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3619473Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 12, 2009
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HI-SCAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victoria Friedman

Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009X-ray inspection devices, namely, scanners for hand and check-in luggage, for large objects, for bulky luggage and packages; scanners; mail and parcel scanning system comprised of scanners, radiation detection devices, and image processing devices; mobile [ X-ray inspection systems comprised of scanners, radiation detection devices, and image processing devices; ] X-ray inspection systems comprising scanners, radiation detection devices, and image processing devices [ for vehicles ]; cargo inspection systems comprising scanners, radiation detection devices, and image processing devices; container inspection systems comprising scanners, electrical and electronic devices, instruments, equipment and installations, namely, X-ray inspection systems for the inspection of objects and persons, particularly in an access, safety or airport area; electrical and electronic devices, instruments, equipment and installations, namely, scanners for non-destructive material examination, [ radioactivity detection, ] explosives detection, drug and narcotic detection, metal detection, weapons detection [ ; electrical, electronic and optical alarm and surveillance devices, namely, scanners, radiation detection devices, and image processing devices, as well as electric and electronic video surveillance installations ]ACTIVE—
045[ Security inspections for others of objects and persons ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2026RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 5, 2020INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Jan 15, 2020INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 15, 2019NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 15, 201971AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 9, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 12, 2018REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2016RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Sep 9, 2016INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Mar 31, 2016INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2016INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jan 27, 2016INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 27, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 27, 2015C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 27, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 11, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2010NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2009FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 24, 2009FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 12, 2009FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 12, 2009R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 24, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 21, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 21, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 21, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 21, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 20, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 20, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 20, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 19, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 10, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 10, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 26, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 10, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 10, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 29, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance