Drawing for SUN REFLECTIONS

USPTO serial 79031155

SUN REFLECTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SUN REFLECTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Watercrafts, boats, inflatable and foldable boats, parts of the aforementioned goods (included in this class)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jul 21, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 25, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 27, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 21, 2009LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 7, 2008FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 3, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 3, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 7, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 7, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 6, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 5, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance