Drawing for WELLBOSS

USPTO serial 79031175

WELLBOSS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3453929Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 24, 2008
Examiner
HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WELLBOSS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy E. Carroll

Amy E. Carroll Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1500 K Street, N.W.Suite 1100Washington, DC 20005-1209

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal rollers for use with cables, rods and strings in the oil and gas well industry; Metal rollers for use with cables, rods and strings on a downhole apparatus for reducing friction in an oil or gas wellSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Motorized or mechanized well intervention tools having friction reducing devices for the purpose of lowering and raising items in and out of wells, namely, downhole conveyors comprising a metal body having at least one roller, the roller being motorized or mechanized to impart a driving force and reduce friction; motorized or mechanized well intervention roller tools for lowering and raising items in and out of wells, namely, downhole conveyors comprising a metal body having at least one roller, the roller being motorized or mechanized to impart a driving force; motorized or mechanized well intervention tools having wheels, rollers, tracks or runners for reducing friction of a string during the lowering and raising of items in and out of an oil or gas well, namely, downhole conveyors comprising a metal body having at least one wheel, roller, track or runner, the wheel, roller, track or runner being motorized or mechanized to reduce friction; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods, namely, non-metal rollers and roller subs for the aforementioned downhole tubes, tubular jars, namely, downhole tubular tools that can release stored compressive or tensile energy so as to generate a shock, linear bearings for machines; motorized or mechanized wireline subs, namely, well intervention sub-assemblies for use with wirelines; maintenance kits and redress kits for the foregoing, namely, kits comprising sealing joints, bearings, wheels, rollers, runners and motors, sold as a unitSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
012Locomotives for use in pipelines and in oil and gas wells; land vehicles for downhole and pipeline use; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods, namely, wheels, swivels for coupling locomotives and land vehicles to downhole tools and strings of tools; maintenance kits and redress kits for the foregoing, namely, kits comprising bearings, wheels, rollers, tracks, runners and motors, sold as a unitSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2016DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jan 31, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 20, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Oct 27, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 30, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 30, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 8, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 24, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 19, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 7, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 7, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 7, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 7, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2007RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 8, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 8, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Dec 28, 2006RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Dec 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance