USPTO serial 79031175
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Aberdeen AB21 0PS, GB
Aberdeen AB21 0PS, GB
Aberdeen AB21 0PS, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy E. Carroll
Amy E. Carroll Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP1500 K Street, N.W.Suite 1100Washington, DC 20005-1209| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal rollers for use with cables, rods and strings in the oil and gas well industry; Metal rollers for use with cables, rods and strings on a downhole apparatus for reducing friction in an oil or gas well | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 007 | Motorized or mechanized well intervention tools having friction reducing devices for the purpose of lowering and raising items in and out of wells, namely, downhole conveyors comprising a metal body having at least one roller, the roller being motorized or mechanized to impart a driving force and reduce friction; motorized or mechanized well intervention roller tools for lowering and raising items in and out of wells, namely, downhole conveyors comprising a metal body having at least one roller, the roller being motorized or mechanized to impart a driving force; motorized or mechanized well intervention tools having wheels, rollers, tracks or runners for reducing friction of a string during the lowering and raising of items in and out of an oil or gas well, namely, downhole conveyors comprising a metal body having at least one wheel, roller, track or runner, the wheel, roller, track or runner being motorized or mechanized to reduce friction; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods, namely, non-metal rollers and roller subs for the aforementioned downhole tubes, tubular jars, namely, downhole tubular tools that can release stored compressive or tensile energy so as to generate a shock, linear bearings for machines; motorized or mechanized wireline subs, namely, well intervention sub-assemblies for use with wirelines; maintenance kits and redress kits for the foregoing, namely, kits comprising sealing joints, bearings, wheels, rollers, runners and motors, sold as a unit | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Locomotives for use in pipelines and in oil and gas wells; land vehicles for downhole and pipeline use; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods, namely, wheels, swivels for coupling locomotives and land vehicles to downhole tools and strings of tools; maintenance kits and redress kits for the foregoing, namely, kits comprising bearings, wheels, rollers, tracks, runners and motors, sold as a unit | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2016 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 22, 2008 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2008 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 9, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |