Drawing for EALONG

USPTO serial 79031233

EALONG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3436228Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 27, 2008
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EALONG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024duvet covers; bed sheets; table cloths not of paper; textile fabrics for the manufacture of clothing; textile fabrics for home and commercial interiors; non-woven textile fabrics for the building industry; textile wall hangings; felts; towels of textile; pillowcases; bed blanketsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, namely coats, trousers, pants, suits, dust coats, uniforms, sweaters, T-shirts; underwear; infant's clothing, namely sleepers, trousers; swim wear; waterproof clothing, namely, pants and jackets; shoes; headgear, namely, caps, hats; socks; stockings; gloves; scarvesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 26, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 9, 2015INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 16, 2015INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2015INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Sep 2, 2015INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jan 2, 2015C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Dec 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2008FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2008FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 27, 2008FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 31, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 5, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 16, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2007RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
Mar 14, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 13, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 7, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance