Drawing for BLUE QUALITY WWW.BLUE-QUALITY.COM

USPTO serial 79031250

BLUE QUALITY WWW.BLUE-QUALITY.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUE QUALITY WWW.BLUE-QUALITY.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter; cardboard; paper; cardboard or paper boxes; posters; newspapers; prospectuses; paper or plastic bags and sachets for packagingSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
029Crustaceans, not live; fish; smoked fishSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
031Live crustaceans; algae for human consumptionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2017UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 19, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
May 19, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 4, 2008DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 22, 2008OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 8, 2008OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2008OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 28, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2007RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 5, 2007RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2007RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 1, 2007RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Feb 28, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 8, 2006NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2006REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance